Call FREE from a Landline or Mobile on 0800 634 75 75

3 years to bring a claim? What the Telly ad’s dont tell you..

Yes, generally you do have 3 years (called the limitation period) from the date of the accident or injury in which to bring a claim (meaning that you must either settle your claim or issue proceedings in the Courts within 3 years) but there are exceptions to the 3 year rule.

Any Personal Injury Lawyer that does not know the rules relating to limitation is heading for big trouble so make sure you speak to a good and experienced Personal Injury Lawyer. Keep in mind, the main source of negligence actions against Personal Injury Lawyers relates to the Limitation Period.

This article provides you with only a brief overview of the law relating to Limitation and is by no means exhaustive. So, as I have said above, for the very best advice relating to your claim speak to a good Personal Injury Lawyer.

I expect you are aware that the vast majority of Personal Injury claims are subject to a 3 year limitation period.

If you haven’t heard it on the radio, seen it on the TV or read it in the newspaper, I don’t know where you have been hiding but I am sure those of you not secluded away from mainstrean media will have seen the ads especially on the telly saying give us a call if you have had an accident in the last 3 years.

Well, what those ad’s dont tell you is that you don’t always actually have 3 years to bring a personal injury claim. So, I just want to highlight some of the exceptions in this article to try and raise a bit of awareness for those client’s left out by the ad’s.

For example if you have suffered an assault (i.e. been beaten up) then as this is not an action under negligence you actually have 6 years to bring a claim and not the 3 years as advertised on the telly.

The limitation Act 1980 actually specifies that the time limit is 3 years for personal injury claims from:

a) the date on which the cause of action accrued; or

b) the date of knowledge (if later) of the person injured

The law of date of knowledge is complex particularly in the fields of industrial disease and medical negligence claims.

Date on which the cause of action accrued

In most cases this is usually straightforward and it usually does relate to the date of the accident. The cause of action is established when the existence of a duty of care, a breach of that duty and damage caused by that breach are proved.

Furthermore, the cause of action accrues as soon as you have suffered any damage which is more than “minimal” even if you are unaware of the fact.

Time stops running when you issue proceedings, so it is not necessary that your claim has to be settled within 3 years of the relevant date but that proceedings must be issued within 3 years of the relevant date, if your claim has not been settled.

Date of knowledge

This is the date on which you first had knowledge of the following facts –

a) that the injury in question was significant;

b) that the injury was attributable in whole or in part to the act or omission which is alleged to constitute negligence, nuisance or breach of duty: and

c) the identity of the defendant; and

d) if it is alleged that the act or omission was that of a person other than the defendant, the identity of that person and the additional facts supporting the bringing of an action against the defendant

Exceptions to the 3 year rule

There are a number of personal injury claims where the 3 year rule does not apply.

i) cases with limitation periods of less than 3 years

ii) cases with limitation periods of more than 3 years

iii) infants and patients

iv) fatal accidents

v) date of knowledge

vi) Court discretion

 

Cases where limitation less than 3 years

Accidents which happen in the air or on water (e.g. aeroplane or ship) have a 2 year limitation period. I suggest you speak to a good Personal Injury Lawyer for further advice in this regard.

For a claim with the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) any claim must be made as soon as possible after an incident and must be received by the Authority no more than 2 years after the incident. Although it may be worth making a case to the claims officer to waive the time limit if you are out of time.

Limitation periods greater than 3 years

An Assault is not an action for neglgence so the 3 year limit does not apply. Instead for assault you have 6 years to bring an action, although you will do well to remember that a claim through the CICA will still have to be made within 2 years.

Consumer Protection Act Claims

Personal injury claims under the Consumer Protection Act 1987 have a 10 year limitation period.

Breach of contract

These claims can be brought within 6 years of the relevant date.

Infants and patients

The general rule under the limitation act is that the limitation period for minors (those under the age of 18 years) is that the limitation period does not run until their 18th birthday. In practice this means that the last day for issuing proceedings or settling the claim is their 21st birthday.

A patient suffering from a disability under the act is the same as a person suffering from a “mental disorder” as defined by the Mental health Act 1983. If the Claimant is a patient at the time of the accident, or rendered a patient by the accident and remains under a disability then the limitation period never starts to run. However, if the claimant’s disability arises later or if there is a period of lucidity when the claimant is not a patient, then the limitation period starts to run. Once the period starts to run it does not stop.

Fatal accidents

The right for the deceased’s estate to make a claim for damages applies whether or not the deceased had started proceedings prior to his death.

The safest assumption to make, when the death was immediate is that the 3 year limitation period runs from the date of the death.

For a more detailed explanation for the limitation period which applies and when it runs out you should speak to a specialist Personal injury lawyer.

Court’s discretion

Under section 33 of the limitation act the Court has discretion to disapply the the strict time limit for certain actions in respect of personal injuries or death. Again, this is a fairly complicated area so it’s best to speak to a Personal Injury Lawyer. If you post a reply to this blog, with a query then as always I will do my best to answer you query as soon as I possibly can.

Request A Call Back

Your Details
Accident Details
Select Your Call Back Time
NHS Email Leak
Search Our Blog
Free Instant Valuation
Compensation Calculator
Instantly Values Your Claim

Instantly value your claim for a head injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a neck injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a shoulder injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a elbow injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for an arm injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a hand injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a torso injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a mid-section injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a back injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a leg injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a knee injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for an ankle/foot injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Find out how much your injury claim is worth!

Click on the injured body part to get your INSTANT FREE personal injury compensation valuation sent to you within seconds...

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

As Seen on TV
Latest Blog Posts

A chemical company was fined £2.4 million after one employee died from a toxic chemical cloud, and another suffered permanent injuries.

A chemical company was fined £2.4 million after one employee died from a toxic chemical cloud, and another suffered permanent injuries.

Cristal Pigment UK Limited (formerly known as Millennium Inorganic Chemicals) in Stallingborough, North East of Lincolnshire, was found guilty for breaching their legal duties when one of their worker...

Published on the 06/02/2017


Amtek fined after employee injured hand on drilling machine

Amtek fined after employee injured hand on drilling machine

Amtek Aluminium Castings (Whitham) Limited was given a fine for health and safety failings after an employee injured his hand using a rotary drilling machine at work. Mr Andrew Gibson was drilling a h...

Published on the 26/01/2017


Supervisor sentenced and fined for negligently exposing workers to asbestos

Supervisor sentenced and fined for negligently exposing workers to asbestos

An asbestos removal supervisor has been fined and sentenced for exposing his team members to deadly asbestos fibres. Alan Burdett was a supervisor for Asbestos Decontamination Services Limited in B...

Published on the 17/01/2017


Construction employee struck by a 215kg skip due to employer's negligence

Construction employee struck by a 215kg skip due to employer's negligence

Site manager and worker ordered to pay seven thousand pounds in fines and costs This story serves as an important reminder that employers have a duty of care to their employees for...

Published on the 03/01/2017


HSE says Slips, trips, and falls” are the most common injuries at work

HSE says "Slips, trips, and falls” are the most common injuries at work

According to Health and Safety Executive (HSE) statistics, slips, trips and falls are the most common injuries at work, accounting for over a third of all major work injuries. Slip incidents are al...

Published on the 22/12/2016


Work claims involving Personal Protective Equipment

Work claims involving Personal Protective Equipment

Your employer has a legal duty to provide you with a safe workplace where all dangers are removed where possible. Where the hazards pose a risk to employees and cannot be removed (perhaps because it's...

Published on the 13/12/2016


Breach of duty causing severe leg and foot injuries - Employee suffers a fractured leg and ankle after Galvanising firm fails to instruct him of the safety procedures

"Breach of duty causing severe leg and foot injuries" - Employee suffers a fractured leg and ankle after Galvanising firm fails to instruct him of the safety procedures

If this is not a lesson learnt, then I do not know what is... T & D Galvanising Ltd were found to have breached the duty of care owed to their employee, Mr Ali Zada, who sadly suffered severe i...

Published on the 06/12/2016


Double Amputation as a Result of Employer's Breach of Duty of Care - Cornish Construction Company fined £200,000 after their employee lose both legs

"Double Amputation as a Result of Employer's Breach of Duty of Care" - Cornish Construction Company fined £200,000 after their employee lose both legs

Health and safety in the workplace is so, so important. Getting it right and wrong can literally be the difference between life and death... In this employer's negligence case, an employee of Corni...

Published on the 28/11/2016


Gresley House Residential care home investigation

Gresley House Residential care home investigation

The Care Quality Commission published a report this year on a care home in Derbyshire where it was found that the care home residents had suffered neglect in the form of not being fed properly; being ...

Published on the 21/11/2016


Duty of Care of an Employer - Roofing Company breached a duty of care owed to their employee, after he fell five metres from a roof

"Duty of Care of an Employer" - Roofing Company breached a duty of care owed to their employee, after he fell five metres from a roof

A 32-year-old man sustained severe injuries after falling five metres through a roof he was working on. His employers, the Richardson Roofing Company Limited (RRCL), were found to be liable for his...

Published on the 16/11/2016


Categories
Archives