Call FREE from a Landline or Mobile on 0800 634 75 75

JSB Guidelines

The most common question asked by client’s who have suffered a personal injury is; ‘what is my claim worth?’ Everyone wants to know what their claim is worth, what they should expect to receive with regards to compensation but what many of them will not ask is; ‘how is my claim calculated?’

Clients, on occasion, will argue that their claim is worth more than is being advised because ‘Jo Blogs’ down the road received more or ‘someone’ told them it would be worth ‘X’ amount. Many clients believe that liable Defendant’s should pay out sums of money for general inconvenience caused or as an apology for causing the incident. Unfortunately, the system does not work in this manor…so how does it work? Are there rules and guidelines in place to aid when making valuations?

The answer is yes and the guidelines in place are the ‘JSB Guidelines’.

The JSB Guidelines are not ‘law’ but there use is encouraged across the courts and most (if not all) insurers and solicitors will use the guidelines when valuing client’s claims.

Why were the guidelines implemented?

One of the most difficult yet common problems for judges hearing personal injury cases in the civil courts, is the assessment of damages for Claimant’s whom have suffered pain, suffering or loss of amenity as a result of the Defendant’s actions. Damages cannot be precisely calculated and each and every case heard, is different. Whilst there is no method of calculation, judges need to ensure that there is some consistency between awards which are made.

As you can see, judges faced a difficult challenge when valuing claims for personal injury and it was thus decided that a framework needed to be established in order to assist them in the process. This is when the JSB Guidelines were brought into place… 1992 to be precise!

The Guidelines intended to provide a framework whereby cases would fall under an umbrella term dictated by the injuries suffered by the Claimant.

What were the intentions of the guidelines?

  • They filter out the unnecessary and irrelevant points which are found in case law.
  • It illustrates the results of case law in ‘layman’ terms
  • The results are depicted in a more logical and coherent format.

What the guidelines do not intend to do:

  • They do not intend to provide a solution to the existing problems
  • They most importantly, do not intend to restrict the judgment of each individual case.

We now know why the guidelines were implemented and what they intend to do in terms of aiding the courts in valuing personal injury claims.

Let’s look at an example…

Mrs Smith was travelling back from her holiday in Cornwall. She is travelling as a front seat passenger, her husband is driving and her 2 children are seated in the back. All family members are wearing their seatbelts and Mr Smith is always cautious when keeping to the speed limits. They reach a junction and have to stop to give way. It is at this point that their vehicle is impacted from behind at very high speed. Their vehicle is shunted out into the traffic on the main road, causing let another collision with another vehicle.
Mrs Smith immediately notices pain in her neck and back but she is able to move and exit the vehicle unaided. However, Mr Smith and their eldest daughter are trapped in the car. Mrs Smith is able to get her youngest daughter out of the vehicle whom is crying.
The fire brigade is called to cut Mr Smith and their daughter free from the vehicle. Mr Smith is placed on a spinal board and taken straight to hospital, as is their daughter.
They later discover that Mr Smith has a broken leg, some broken ribs and has a severe whiplash injury to his neck and back. Their eldest daughter has a broken nose, severe bruising to her right side and again a whiplash type injury to her back. Mrs Smith and her youngest daughter escaped any serious injury but have whiplash injuries to their neck and back.

So what can they expect to receive with regards to compensation?

Below are some examples from the JSB guidelines relating to the injuries that they have sustained and the brackets in which their compensation rewards are likely to fall.

Mr Smith’s leg injury:

(c) Less Serious Leg Injuries

(i) Fractures from which an Incomplete Recovery is Made

The injured person will be left with a metal implant and/or defective gait, a limp, impaired mobility, sensory loss, discomfort or an exacerbation of a pre-existing disability… £11,500 to £17,750

(ii) Simple Fracture of a Femur with No Damage to Articular Surfaces… £5,750 to £9,000

(iii) Simple Fractures and Soft Tissue Injuries… Up to £5,750

Mr Smith’s leg injury falls in to the ‘less serious leg injury’ category and a valuation in this respect will depend on the severity and duration of the leg injury.

The eldest daughter’s broken nose:

(c) Fractures of Nose or Nasal Complex

(i) Serious or multiple fractures requiring a number of operations and/or resulting in permanent damage to airways and/or nerves or tear ducts and/or facial deformity… £6,750 to £14,750

(ii) Displaced fracture where recovery complete but only after surgery… £2,500 to £3,250

(iii) Displaced fracture requiring no more than manipulation… £1,600 to £2,000

(iv) Simple undisplaced fracture with full recovery… £1,100 to £1,600

Again, the valuation will all depend on the severity and duration of the injury. If a full recovery is made without any complications then a lower valuation is to be expected. However, should the fracture require surgery in order to correct it then she can expect to recover a much higher valuation.

These are just a few examples and the above scenario contains multiple injuries. All injuries will be covered by a framework similar to the examples provided above and all aspects of the injuries will be taken in to consideration alongside the consideration of existing case law.

Whilst the JSB Guidelines are not a definitive answer as to what you will definitely receive with regards to a compensation reward; they act as a very good indicator and you can be sure that they will be used and followed when your own claim is being valued.

Call us on FREE from a landline or mobile on 0800 634 75 75, or if you prefer why not arrange a callback from one of our team, for instant FREE advice on whether you have a compensation claim to make!

Need one of our expert claims team to call you back about an injury claim? Then please enter your name, the telephone number you would like us to call you back on, the accident type and when you would like us to contact you in the form below.

Request A Call Back

Your Details
Accident Details
Select Your Call Back Time
NHS Email Leak
Search Our Blog
Free Instant Valuation
Compensation Calculator
Instantly Values Your Claim

Instantly value your claim for a head injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a neck injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a shoulder injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a elbow injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for an arm injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a hand injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a torso injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a mid-section injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a back injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a leg injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for a knee injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Instantly value your claim for an ankle/foot injury!


Minor Moderate Severe

Find out how much your injury claim is worth!

Click on the injured body part to get your INSTANT FREE personal injury compensation valuation sent to you within seconds...

Yes No

Yes No

Yes No

As Seen on TV
Latest Blog Posts

Hundreds of patients coming forward after rogue surgeon convicted of wounding with intent

Hundreds of patients coming forward after rogue surgeon convicted of wounding with intent

The Injury Lawyers are investigating the issues surrounding Paterson's convictions, and any victims who need our expert legal advice are welcome to approach us for help Former renowned bre...

Published on the 26/05/2017


Employee suffers deep lacerations from chainsaw use

Employee suffers deep lacerations from chainsaw use

Injuries can happen anywhere, any place and at any time; and most certainly at work. This was the case for one employee who was injured by a chainsaw whilst they were cutting down a tree. ...

Published on the 19/05/2017


Uber to resume their 'self-driving' vehicle testing after crash

Uber to resume their 'self-driving' vehicle testing after crash

The alternative taxi company Uber have recently restarted their testing after a three day suspension following an autonomous vehicle test crash. Uber were testing one of their Volva XC90s in its 's...

Published on the 11/05/2017


A Concrete Firm has been fined a whopping £300,000 after an employee suffers leg amputation injury

A Concrete Firm has been fined a whopping £300,000 after an employee suffers leg amputation injury

On the 30th June 2015 a 42 year-old unnamed employee was working nearby a trailer on a Buchan Concrete Solutions' Drakelow site in Burton-on-Trent. He was working next to where concrete blo...

Published on the 04/05/2017


Is the exploding Fitbit going to be the next Samsung Galaxy Note 7 scenario?

Is the exploding Fitbit going to be the next Samsung Galaxy Note 7 scenario?

Although technology is growing at an unprecedented rate, the safety of such technological products remains questionable. The first trend of such products exploding/catching on fire started with the...

Published on the 28/04/2017


Gloucester Crown Court issues £600,000 fine after employee was set on fire

Gloucester Crown Court issues £600,000 fine after employee was set on fire

The Health and Safety Executive have concluded their investigations into a horrific incident that saw a 61 year-old man set on fire whilst working on site. Mr Steven Brown was working on installing...

Published on the 21/04/2017


Accident at work caused an employee skin loss and a fractured finger

Accident at work caused an employee skin loss and a fractured finger

Employers are legally responsible for employee safety and must do all they can to prevent employees from being injured in the workplace. A seal and label producing company based in Kent was fined a...

Published on the 12/04/2017


District Council fined quarter of a million after employee suffers Hand Arm Vibration (HAV) Syndrome

District Council fined quarter of a million after employee suffers Hand Arm Vibration (HAV) Syndrome

Thanet District Council in Kent have been fined a quarter of a million pounds after an employee was diagnosed with Hard Arm Vibration (HAV) Syndrome. The council was also found to have breached the...

Published on the 06/04/2017


Monster energy drink to be sued over teen death

Monster energy drink to be sued over teen death

Back in 2015, a teenager named Dustin Hood drank 3 and a half cans of Monster Energy drinks within 24 hours. These supersized cans held 680ml each, meaning he drank in total over two litres of high...

Published on the 22/03/2017


Samsung blames faulty batteries for the Galaxy Note 7 smartphones to catch fire

Samsung blames faulty batteries for the Galaxy Note 7 smartphones to catch fire

Samsung has been engaged in fierce competition with Apple to be the top mobile phone provider in the world. Consumers have witnessed the two brands constantly spewing out countless smartphones, each o...

Published on the 14/03/2017


Categories
Archives