Why Insurers Hate the Mobile Camera

How many of us have mobile phones? Millions! How many of us have mobile phones with built-in cameras? Still, Millions!. Using mobile cameras at the scene of an accident is a critical piece of evidence in any compensation case.

Photographic evidence is hard to disprove, even for insurers. Sure they’ll argue how the accident took place even try to play down your injuries but when they are faced with photographic proof shot from a mobile phone, that’s a tough nut to crack.

Photographs provide visual proof of the accident scene, hard evidence of any obstructions that were in your way and also show the extent of your injuries.

Even though your memory of the incident may change through time and certain details may be lost or become distorted, photographs preserve the scene.

Now, you understand why insurers hate the rise of the mobile camera because they can argue against your side of the story of how the events played out but they cannot dismiss hard photographic proof.

If you are interested in getting quality advice about claiming compensation then get in contact with The Injury Lawyers. Our experience counts when it matters.

Related Post

This website uses cookies.