Call FREE from a Landline on 0800 634 75 75
Call from a Mobile on 01246 474 745

Law On Accidents Due To Sudden Stop

Generally speaking if Person A caused his or her motor vehicle to crash into the back of Person B’s motor vehicle, then Person A would be at fault. This is of course a typical rear end shunt scenario whereby liability is usually attached to the driver who drove his or her vehicle into collision with the vehicle in front. As a driver myself, this must be the correct decision as you have no control over the vehicle that is driving behind you. However in some strange and unusual circumstances Person B in the above scenario could be held at fault.

You would generally have to look at the reason why Person B stopped so suddenly and without warning. When a sudden stop was made due to a traffic sign or signal, the driver is highly unlikely to be held at fault if another vehicle crashes into the back of him.

There may be a need to stop suddenly if, for example, a child runs out into the road. In this scenario it is of course reasonable to stop suddenly and it is highly unlikely that you would be held at fault if another vehicle crashes into the back of you. I could never say that it is impossible to be held at fault in these situations as every case is taken on its own facts.

You could be at fault if you stopped suddenly and without warning for no good reason. Even if your vehicle was not involved in the accident itself, you could still be held at fault. Say for example Vehicle A stopped suddenly and without good reason, Vehicle B managed to stop in time but Vehicle C crashed into the back of Vehicle B. If there was no good reason for Vehicle A to stop suddenly then they may be held liable for the accident. In these cases of extenuating circumstances the person who stopped suddenly may be at fault. There is no strict rule on this area of law as every case is considered based on its own unique facts. It appears that the questions that must be asked are:

  1. What caused the diver to stop so suddenly and without warning?
  2. Was it reasonable for the driver to stop so suddenly and without warning?

In Gussman v Gratton-Storey the Defendant applied her breaks violently in order to avoid hitting a pheasant running across the road. The driver behind was unable to stop and collided with the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant was held liable so in this case the sudden stop was in effect held to be unreasonable. The lead driver was held liable in this case. You can see the difficult precedent that this case sets. It leaves a difficult decision as to just when it is reasonable to stop suddenly. For example, would one animal running into the road cause a reasonable sudden stop and another animal running into the road cause a sudden stop that was unreasonable? It is a bit like deciding which animals you can drive over and which you must treat as though it were a human.

Each case is considered on its facts; if you collided into the back of another vehicle then it is likely that a Court would hold you at fault. However if the car in front stopped suddenly without any or any good reason, then the driver of the vehicle that stopped suddenly may be at fault. Say the driver stopped suddenly due to ducks in the road, a Court may say that this was an insufficient reason to brake and stop suddenly.

Such cases may inevitably result in huge liability arguments. There may be a disagreement as to who is at fault. Therefore it is essential that you seek independent legal advice.

We are specialist personal injury lawyers, so do not hesitate to call us today on 0800 634 75 75.

Request a call back from our expert claims team

Your Details
Accident Details
Select Your Call Back Time

Personal Injury Claims Solicitors

NHS HIV Email Leak
Search Our Blog
Free Instant Valuation
As Seen on TV
Latest Blog Posts

Motorbike accident compensation help and advice

Motorbike accident compensation help and advice

Claiming for motorbike accident compensation can be a long road indeed. We have helped countless people claim the compensation they deserve after being the victim in a road traffic accident and withou...

Published on the 01/09/2015


Medical lawyers for you

Medical lawyers for you

Need a medical lawyer? Look no further than our specialist team here at The Injury Lawyers. Our medical lawyers are here for you. We are here to help you through your traumatic experience and fight...

Published on the 01/09/2015


Double cream product recall - low levels of food poisoning found

Double cream product recall - low levels of food poisoning found

According to the Food Standards Agency (FSA), hundreds of double cream products are being recalled due to low levels of Listeria monocytogenes being found in a number of pots. Those recalling products...

Published on the 01/09/2015


Sawmill workers compensation rights explained

Sawmill workers compensation rights explained

Sawmills are of course very dangerous places, and health and safety is of paramount importance to ensure that employees are not injured during the course of their employment. But sawmills and firms in...

Published on the 28/08/2015


Injured by accessing an unsecured building site

Injured by accessing an unsecured building site

Building sites are, of course, extremely dangerous. I know it's a bit of an obvious statement but it is extremely relevant when discussing accidents on building sites. Those in contro...

Published on the 28/08/2015


Fall from unsecured ladder on a vehicle claim

Fall from unsecured ladder on a vehicle claim

The Work at Height Regulations put an important duty on your employer to make sure that you are not at risk from a fall during the course of employment. When it comes to falls from unsecured ladders o...

Published on the 28/08/2015


Supermarket roll cages - your rights explained!

Supermarket roll cages - your rights explained!

We help a lot of people make a work accident compensation claim after they've been injured by a supermarket roll cage. There are a ...

Published on the 27/08/2015


Tesco 'Free From 5 Belgium Chocolate Wafers' recalled following reports of possible salmonella

Tesco 'Free From 5 Belgium Chocolate Wafers' recalled following reports of possible salmonella

I'm sure it doesn't take an injury lawyer to tell you just how dangerous salmonella can be. It makes these kinds of food product recalls all the more serious in nature. The ...

Published on the 27/08/2015


Help with medical compensation claims

Help with medical compensation claims

Being the victim of medical negligence is a scary experience. Bringing your much needed and deserved medical compensation claim can be equally as frightening too. That's why we are here to help you...

Published on the 27/08/2015


£10K payout for worker injured by dangerous drill

£10K payout for worker injured by dangerous drill

Our client instructed us after he dislocated two fingers when his overalls were caught in the mechanism of a magnetic drill he was using at work. There were no guards on the drill and no emergency sto...

Published on the 25/08/2015


Categories
Archives