Call us FREE on
0800 634 75 75 Now!

Law On Accidents Due To Sudden Stop

Generally speaking if Person A caused his or her motor vehicle to crash into the back of Person B’s motor vehicle, then Person A would be at fault. This is of course a typical rear end shunt scenario whereby liability is usually attached to the driver who drove his or her vehicle into collision with the vehicle in front. As a driver myself, this must be the correct decision as you have no control over the vehicle that is driving behind you. However in some strange and unusual circumstances Person B in the above scenario could be held at fault.

You would generally have to look at the reason why Person B stopped so suddenly and without warning. When a sudden stop was made due to a traffic sign or signal, the driver is highly unlikely to be held at fault if another vehicle crashes into the back of him.

There may be a need to stop suddenly if, for example, a child runs out into the road. In this scenario it is of course reasonable to stop suddenly and it is highly unlikely that you would be held at fault if another vehicle crashes into the back of you. I could never say that it is impossible to be held at fault in these situations as every case is taken on its own facts.

You could be at fault if you stopped suddenly and without warning for no good reason. Even if your vehicle was not involved in the accident itself, you could still be held at fault. Say for example Vehicle A stopped suddenly and without good reason, Vehicle B managed to stop in time but Vehicle C crashed into the back of Vehicle B. If there was no good reason for Vehicle A to stop suddenly then they may be held liable for the accident. In these cases of extenuating circumstances the person who stopped suddenly may be at fault. There is no strict rule on this area of law as every case is considered based on its own unique facts. It appears that the questions that must be asked are:

  1. What caused the diver to stop so suddenly and without warning?
  2. Was it reasonable for the driver to stop so suddenly and without warning?

In Gussman v Gratton-Storey the Defendant applied her breaks violently in order to avoid hitting a pheasant running across the road. The driver behind was unable to stop and collided with the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant was held liable so in this case the sudden stop was in effect held to be unreasonable. The lead driver was held liable in this case. You can see the difficult precedent that this case sets. It leaves a difficult decision as to just when it is reasonable to stop suddenly. For example, would one animal running into the road cause a reasonable sudden stop and another animal running into the road cause a sudden stop that was unreasonable? It is a bit like deciding which animals you can drive over and which you must treat as though it were a human.

Each case is considered on its facts; if you collided into the back of another vehicle then it is likely that a Court would hold you at fault. However if the car in front stopped suddenly without any or any good reason, then the driver of the vehicle that stopped suddenly may be at fault. Say the driver stopped suddenly due to ducks in the road, a Court may say that this was an insufficient reason to brake and stop suddenly.

Such cases may inevitably result in huge liability arguments. There may be a disagreement as to who is at fault. Therefore it is essential that you seek independent legal advice.

We are specialist personal injury lawyers, so do not hesitate to call us today on 0800 634 75 75.

Request a call back from our Claims Team

Your Details
Accident Details
Select Your Call Back Time
Free Instant Valuation
As Seen on TV
Latest Blog Posts

How to make a successful pothole claim

How to make a successful pothole claim

Making a successful pothole claim is not an easy thing to do. The law that applies when investigating and finding out whether you are entitled to compensation for a pothole accident is not on the side...

Published on the 03/07/2015


Have you suffered medical negligence from more than 3 years ago?

Have you suffered medical negligence from more than 3 years ago?

You may have heard of the term “"ave you had an accident in the last three years?" or you may have sought legal advice only to be told that, because what happened to you occurred over three years ag...

Published on the 03/07/2015


PIP Implant Claims - French Court of Appeal says TÜV Rheinland NOT Liable

PIP Implant Claims - French Court of Appeal says TÜV Rheinland NOT Liable

We received the news from our French lawyers earlier yesterday morning that the appeal from German regulators TÜV Rheinland had been upheld. This has overturned the decisions made in the Commercial C...

Published on the 03/07/2015


Are claim companies allowed to give you 100% of the claim?

Are claim companies allowed to give you 100% of the claim?

Well there is nothing that legally stops you from being offered a 100% compensation agreement, but for most types of cases it is highly unlikely. Sadly the law changed two years ago and the governm...

Published on the 01/07/2015


The Injury Lawyers - THE reputable compensation firm for you!

The Injury Lawyers - THE reputable compensation firm for you!

Do you know why we are called THE Injury Lawyers? It's fairly obvious - its because we are THE original Injury Lawyers, and we have decades of experience in helpin...

Published on the 01/07/2015


Annual fatal work incident numbers released

Annual fatal work incident numbers released

Fatalities at work are of course truly awful. We represent the families for cases and its never easy - especially when we live in a country where health and safety is deemed as generally very good. ...

Published on the 01/07/2015


Roll cages and the Law in personal injury claims

Roll cages and the Law in personal injury claims

A roll cage is normally classed as work equipment which means that it is subject to The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations. These regulations put in place several duties ...

Published on the 30/06/2015


Foot caught in plastic wrapping injury claims advice!

Foot caught in plastic wrapping injury claims advice!

Have you got your got your foot caught in plastic wrapping? Those hard, plastic, white wrappings can be a real danger, and we take on a lot of claims both in the workplace and in public places like su...

Published on the 30/06/2015


Repetitive shoulder strain injury at work settled for £7,500

Repetitive shoulder strain injury at work settled for £7,500

Repetitive strain injury cases can be very difficult to win for several reasons. Proving that your employer has actually breached the law can be difficult, but even harder than that can be proving tha...

Published on the 30/06/2015


Can whiplash be delayed a couple of days?

Can whiplash be delayed a couple of days?

The simple answer is yes - it can. It's actually very common to feel no symptoms on the actual day of an accident. The symptoms of whiplash will typically develop over the course of the 12-48 hours...

Published on the 29/06/2015


Categories
Archives
Follow Us Online

Have a question? Call our Claims Help team for free expert legal advice on 0800 634 75 75