Call FREE from a Landline or Mobile on 0800 634 75 75

Law On Accidents Due To Sudden Stop

Generally speaking if Person A caused his or her motor vehicle to crash into the back of Person B’s motor vehicle, then Person A would be at fault. This is of course a typical rear end shunt scenario whereby liability is usually attached to the driver who drove his or her vehicle into collision with the vehicle in front. As a driver myself, this must be the correct decision as you have no control over the vehicle that is driving behind you. However in some strange and unusual circumstances Person B in the above scenario could be held at fault.

You would generally have to look at the reason why Person B stopped so suddenly and without warning. When a sudden stop was made due to a traffic sign or signal, the driver is highly unlikely to be held at fault if another vehicle crashes into the back of him.

There may be a need to stop suddenly if, for example, a child runs out into the road. In this scenario it is of course reasonable to stop suddenly and it is highly unlikely that you would be held at fault if another vehicle crashes into the back of you. I could never say that it is impossible to be held at fault in these situations as every case is taken on its own facts.

You could be at fault if you stopped suddenly and without warning for no good reason. Even if your vehicle was not involved in the accident itself, you could still be held at fault. Say for example Vehicle A stopped suddenly and without good reason, Vehicle B managed to stop in time but Vehicle C crashed into the back of Vehicle B. If there was no good reason for Vehicle A to stop suddenly then they may be held liable for the accident. In these cases of extenuating circumstances the person who stopped suddenly may be at fault. There is no strict rule on this area of law as every case is considered based on its own unique facts. It appears that the questions that must be asked are:

  1. What caused the diver to stop so suddenly and without warning?
  2. Was it reasonable for the driver to stop so suddenly and without warning?

In Gussman v Gratton-Storey the Defendant applied her breaks violently in order to avoid hitting a pheasant running across the road. The driver behind was unable to stop and collided with the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant was held liable so in this case the sudden stop was in effect held to be unreasonable. The lead driver was held liable in this case. You can see the difficult precedent that this case sets. It leaves a difficult decision as to just when it is reasonable to stop suddenly. For example, would one animal running into the road cause a reasonable sudden stop and another animal running into the road cause a sudden stop that was unreasonable? It is a bit like deciding which animals you can drive over and which you must treat as though it were a human.

Each case is considered on its facts; if you collided into the back of another vehicle then it is likely that a Court would hold you at fault. However if the car in front stopped suddenly without any or any good reason, then the driver of the vehicle that stopped suddenly may be at fault. Say the driver stopped suddenly due to ducks in the road, a Court may say that this was an insufficient reason to brake and stop suddenly.

Such cases may inevitably result in huge liability arguments. There may be a disagreement as to who is at fault. Therefore it is essential that you seek independent legal advice.

We are specialist personal injury lawyers, so do not hesitate to call us today on 0800 634 75 75.

Request A Call Back

Your Details
Accident Details
Select Your Call Back Time
NHS Email Leak
Search Our Blog
Free Instant Valuation
As Seen on TV
Latest Blog Posts

National Steel firm fined £1.98million for safety failings

National Steel firm fined £1.98million for safety failings

Tata Steel has been fined as two workers suffered hand injuries on two separate incidents involving machinery. A 52-year-old employee lost part of his little finger when his left hand was caught in...

Published on the 23/08/2016


Star Wars Producers plead guilty to failing to protect actors and workers

Star Wars Producers plead guilty to failing to protect actors and workers

Foodles Production (UK) Ltd have pleaded guilty to failing to protect actors and workers on set following an incident where Hollywood actor Harrison Ford suffered a broken leg and other injuries. Harr...

Published on the 16/08/2016


Orthopaedic medical negligence compensation claims

Orthopaedic medical negligence compensation claims

Orthopaedics is commonly the treatment of bones, joints, tendons, muscles, ligaments, and cartilage. These are all elements that make up the musculoskeletal system. Musculoskeletal injuries can aff...

Published on the 10/08/2016


Amputation Injury Claims

Amputation Injury Claims

Amputation injuries are, of course, very serious indeed. As well as amputation from traumatic injury, medical amputation may be necessary from suffering a serious injury or a serious infection to a...

Published on the 03/08/2016


Is your job at stake when making a work accident claim?

Is your job at stake when making a work accident claim?

Before we answer this question, lets understand first how a work accident claim actually works... The Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employer...

Published on the 29/06/2016


A swift guide to road accident claims

A swift guide to road accident claims

Have you had a road traffic accident in the past three years? If you answered yes then you could be entitled to claim compensation! Below is some general guidance as to how The Injury Lawyers can h...

Published on the 29/06/2016


X-Rays and Scans (MRI Scans, CT Scans, etc) Compensation Claims

X-Rays and Scans (MRI Scans, CT Scans, etc) Compensation Claims

Scans: one of the fastest way of obtaining a diagnosis without having to cut people open all the time to find out what's going on! As technology has moved forward we now have the benefit of x-rays ...

Published on the 01/06/2016


Vauxhall Zafira problems - Compensation for Vauxhall Zafira fire victims

Vauxhall Zafira problems - Compensation for Vauxhall Zafira fire victims

It has been announced that compensation will be available for victims who have had problems with Vauxhall Zafira engines spontaneously setting on fire. More than 234,000 vehicles have been recalled...

Published on the 27/05/2016


Statins computer glitch: thousands at risk of prescription errors

Statins computer glitch: thousands at risk of prescription errors

A computer glitch in a system used to calculate the risks of cardiovascular diseases has resulted in thousands of GP practices across the UK issuing incorrect advice over the use of cholesterol-loweri...

Published on the 16/05/2016


Mr. N awarded £10,000 after long battle for work accident compensation

Mr. N awarded £10,000 after long battle for work accident compensation

The Injury Lawyers have successfully fought for Mr. N and obtained him an award of £10,000.00 after a long battle with the defendant's insurers and solicitors who tried to deny responsibility fo...

Published on the 29/04/2016


Categories
Archives