Call FREE from a Landline or Mobile on 0800 634 75 75

JSB Guidelines

compensation

The most common question asked by client’s who have suffered a personal injury is; ‘what is my claim worth?’ Everyone wants to know what their claim is worth, what they should expect to receive with regards to compensation but what many of them will not ask is; ‘how is my claim calculated?’

Clients, on occasion, will argue that their claim is worth more than is being advised because ‘Jo Blogs’ down the road received more or ‘someone’ told them it would be worth ‘X’ amount. Many clients believe that liable Defendant’s should pay out sums of money for general inconvenience caused or as an apology for causing the incident. Unfortunately, the system does not work in this manor…so how does it work? Are there rules and guidelines in place to aid when making valuations?

The answer is yes and the guidelines in place are the ‘JSB Guidelines’.

The JSB Guidelines are not ‘law’ but there use is encouraged across the courts and most (if not all) insurers and solicitors will use the guidelines when valuing client’s claims.

Why were the guidelines implemented?

One of the most difficult yet common problems for judges hearing personal injury cases in the civil courts, is the assessment of damages for Claimant’s whom have suffered pain, suffering or loss of amenity as a result of the Defendant’s actions. Damages cannot be precisely calculated and each and every case heard, is different. Whilst there is no method of calculation, judges need to ensure that there is some consistency between awards which are made.

As you can see, judges faced a difficult challenge when valuing claims for personal injury and it was thus decided that a framework needed to be established in order to assist them in the process. This is when the JSB Guidelines were brought into place… 1992 to be precise!

The Guidelines intended to provide a framework whereby cases would fall under an umbrella term dictated by the injuries suffered by the Claimant.

What were the intentions of the guidelines?

  • They filter out the unnecessary and irrelevant points which are found in case law.
  • It illustrates the results of case law in ‘layman’ terms
  • The results are depicted in a more logical and coherent format.

What the guidelines do not intend to do:

  • They do not intend to provide a solution to the existing problems
  • They most importantly, do not intend to restrict the judgment of each individual case.

We now know why the guidelines were implemented and what they intend to do in terms of aiding the courts in valuing personal injury claims.

Let’s look at an example…

Mrs Smith was travelling back from her holiday in Cornwall. She is travelling as a front seat passenger, her husband is driving and her 2 children are seated in the back. All family members are wearing their seatbelts and Mr Smith is always cautious when keeping to the speed limits. They reach a junction and have to stop to give way. It is at this point that their vehicle is impacted from behind at very high speed. Their vehicle is shunted out into the traffic on the main road, causing let another collision with another vehicle.
Mrs Smith immediately notices pain in her neck and back but she is able to move and exit the vehicle unaided. However, Mr Smith and their eldest daughter are trapped in the car. Mrs Smith is able to get her youngest daughter out of the vehicle whom is crying.
The fire brigade is called to cut Mr Smith and their daughter free from the vehicle. Mr Smith is placed on a spinal board and taken straight to hospital, as is their daughter.
They later discover that Mr Smith has a broken leg, some broken ribs and has a severe whiplash injury to his neck and back. Their eldest daughter has a broken nose, severe bruising to her right side and again a whiplash type injury to her back. Mrs Smith and her youngest daughter escaped any serious injury but have whiplash injuries to their neck and back.

So what can they expect to receive with regards to compensation?

Below are some examples from the JSB guidelines relating to the injuries that they have sustained and the brackets in which their compensation rewards are likely to fall.

Mr Smith’s leg injury:

(c) Less Serious Leg Injuries

(i) Fractures from which an Incomplete Recovery is Made

The injured person will be left with a metal implant and/or defective gait, a limp, impaired mobility, sensory loss, discomfort or an exacerbation of a pre-existing disability… £11,500 to £17,750

(ii) Simple Fracture of a Femur with No Damage to Articular Surfaces… £5,750 to £9,000

(iii) Simple Fractures and Soft Tissue Injuries… Up to £5,750

Mr Smith’s leg injury falls in to the ‘less serious leg injury’ category and a valuation in this respect will depend on the severity and duration of the leg injury.

The eldest daughter’s broken nose:

(c) Fractures of Nose or Nasal Complex

(i) Serious or multiple fractures requiring a number of operations and/or resulting in permanent damage to airways and/or nerves or tear ducts and/or facial deformity… £6,750 to £14,750

(ii) Displaced fracture where recovery complete but only after surgery… £2,500 to £3,250

(iii) Displaced fracture requiring no more than manipulation… £1,600 to £2,000

(iv) Simple undisplaced fracture with full recovery… £1,100 to £1,600

Again, the valuation will all depend on the severity and duration of the injury. If a full recovery is made without any complications then a lower valuation is to be expected. However, should the fracture require surgery in order to correct it then she can expect to recover a much higher valuation.

These are just a few examples and the above scenario contains multiple injuries. All injuries will be covered by a framework similar to the examples provided above and all aspects of the injuries will be taken in to consideration alongside the consideration of existing case law.

Whilst the JSB Guidelines are not a definitive answer as to what you will definitely receive with regards to a compensation reward; they act as a very good indicator and you can be sure that they will be used and followed when your own claim is being valued.

Call us on FREE from a landline or mobile on 0800 634 75 75, or if you prefer why not arrange a callback from one of our team, for instant FREE advice on whether you have a compensation claim to make!

Need one of our expert claims team to call you back about an injury claim? Then please enter your name, the telephone number you would like us to call you back on, the accident type and when you would like us to contact you in the form below.

Request A Call Back

Your Details
Accident Details
Select Your Call Back Time
NHS Email Leak
Search Our Blog
Free Instant Valuation
As Seen on TV
Latest Blog Posts

X-Rays and Scans (MRI Scans, CT Scans, etc) Compensation Claims

X-Rays and Scans (MRI Scans, CT Scans, etc) Compensation Claims

Scans: one of the fastest way of obtaining a diagnosis without having to cut people open all the time to find out what's going on! As technology has moved forward we now have the benefit of x-rays ...

Published on the 01/06/2016


Vauxhall Zafira problems - Compensation for Vauxhall Zafira fire victims

Vauxhall Zafira problems - Compensation for Vauxhall Zafira fire victims

It has been announced that compensation will be available for victims who have had problems with Vauxhall Zafira engines spontaneously setting on fire. More than 234,000 vehicles have been recalled...

Published on the 27/05/2016


Statins computer glitch: thousands at risk of prescription errors

Statins computer glitch: thousands at risk of prescription errors

A computer glitch in a system used to calculate the risks of cardiovascular diseases has resulted in thousands of GP practices across the UK issuing incorrect advice over the use of cholesterol-loweri...

Published on the 16/05/2016


Mr. N awarded £10,000 after long battle for work accident compensation

Mr. N awarded £10,000 after long battle for work accident compensation

The Injury Lawyers have successfully fought for Mr. N and obtained him an award of £10,000.00 after a long battle with the defendant's insurers and solicitors who tried to deny responsibility fo...

Published on the 29/04/2016


Home Visit Lawyers

Home Visit Lawyers

For serious injury cases and complex compensation claims we can normally offer home visits for clients. We know how important a face to face meeting is - in fact, it's as important for us as it is ...

Published on the 18/04/2016


The Injury Lawyers - taking action in the University of Greenwich Data Breach

The Injury Lawyers - taking action in the University of Greenwich Data Breach

Data breaches that cause distress (which is common) falls within our remit here at The Injury Lawyers, and we have been advising victims of the University of Greenwich data bre...

Published on the 06/04/2016


Medical Negligence Compensation for something that happened a long time ago?

Medical Negligence Compensation for something that happened a long time ago?

When you hear the adverts asking if you have had an accident in the last three years, there is a very specific reason for it... The law in England and Wales generally means that you have to br...

Published on the 15/03/2016


Risk of explosion identified in ZeniPower hearing aid batteries

Risk of explosion identified in ZeniPower hearing aid batteries

A medical device alert has been issued by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for ZeniPower mercury-free batteries manufactured by Zhuhai Zhi Li Battery Co Ltd. The affected batte...

Published on the 11/03/2016


Update on our 56 Dean Street Clinic action - settlements will be available

Update on our 56 Dean Street Clinic action - settlements will be available

We're now at an advanced stage of our action for justice for many victims of the 56 Dean Street Clinic, where an email was sent to almost 800 users of an online service for HIV suffer...

Published on the 09/03/2016


Heart Surgery survival rate under scrutiny at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham

Heart Surgery survival rate under scrutiny at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham

According to information from The Guardian, statistics for survival rates of heart surgery at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham are being investigated by the Care Quality Commission (CQC). ...

Published on the 04/03/2016


Categories
Archives